Reality Rating

Habitats Databases

Habitats Databases

This is the third installment of our  SpaceFund Reality (SFR) rating, focused on space habitats. With this rating we begin to move into areas that are more obviously related to the SpaceFund mission of supporting “frontier enabling” technologies. While the launch database showed a field that is over crowded, many other critical sectors of the space economy are not, and some are frankly, wide open. 

Our research has showed that this sector, space habitats, is still underdeveloped and represents a potential opportunity for investors and entrepreneurs. If one is to believe what Musk, Bezos and governments such as the US and UAE are saying about their plans to both dramatically lower the cost of space access and enable a permanent human presence in space, within a few years we may see a ‘housing shortage’ on the frontier.

It is important to note that space also presents us with many unique challenges, not the least of which is applying traditional terrestrial definitions to things that may seem to be the same in space – or – as often happens – a tendency to create new and exotic names to apply to what on Earth would be common. For example, “habitats” or “space stations.” In actuality both of these are just buildings. They may be located in space, they may be exotic in their form, technology, and structure, but they are still just buildings. They are designed to hold or house people and/or the things and objects that belong to people, or that people use. While some of them may move, such as a habitat orbiting the Earth or a Lagrange point in space, they are not intended or designed to move and deliver people or payloads from point A to point B.

Our research into this sector also highlighted two distinct groups of companies that are actively designing and developing habitats. While these companies are all planning to or are constructing buildings in space, they are working to solve fundamentally different problems depending on the location of those buildings. This means the types of companies, the types of habitats, and the types of engineers and scientists working on those solutions are fundamentally different. For this reason, we have broken these companies into two different database: In-Space Habitats and Surface Habitats.  

If you haven’t already, please consult our SpaceFund Reality (SFR) ratings page to learn more about the rating, its purpose, and the underlying formula, as well as to view a complete list of the SpaceFund sectors of interest. 

How to Use This Table

Sort: Click on the column heading to sort A-Z; click again to sort Z-A.

Search: To search within the entire table, simply type your query into the search area at the top right of the table. If you’d like to search within a specific column, use the search box at the bottom of that column.

Download: You can download this table as an Excel or CSV file by using the icons at the top of the table. You can also print the table.

Screen Size: The database is too big to fit on most screens, so you’ll need to use the scroll bar at the bottom of your screen to scroll right to see additional columns, and continuing scrolling down to see all companies. 

Important Note (Alpha Sort Columns vs Numeric Sort Columns): In the Occupancy, Floor Area, and Volume columns, any figure listed as a “0” is simply a placeholder for unavailable data. This is due to the nature of this table format, and to ensure that the columns sort properly, a numeric character must be included in each cell. So, for example, if a company’s habitat is listed to have a Floor Area of “0” this simply means that this information is not publicly available and the “0” acts as a replacement for “N/A”.  

The Funding column is set to sort alphabetically. Since this column contains alphabetic characters in some cells, it will sort alphabetically, not numerically and so the “-” character has been used to represent unavailable data. All other columns in the table will also sort alphabetically.

Important Note (Companies not Products): This database, and the SpaceFund Reality ratings, are based on COMPANIES, not specific products or technologies. 


How to Provide Updated Data

Have we missed your company? Do you feel that your company should have a different rating? Is the listed data inaccurate or outdated? Do you see missing data for your company? The best way to update your information in this database is to reach out to us directly to provide additional information about your technology, management team, funding history, and company progress. We are also eager to learn about any additional data sources that can help us in our ongoing research, so please feel free to share any resources you know of with our team.

Updates will be published on approximately a monthly basis.  

SpaceFund Reality (SFR) Rating

In-Space Habitats Database

(scroll down or click here to see the Surface Habitats Database)

 Last Update: June 22, 2020

Habitats (In-Space)

wdt_ID Company SFR Destination Category Funding ($M) Occupancy Floor Area (m^2) Volume (m^3) Country HQ Location Description
50 Axiom Space 7 Earth Orbit Owner/Operator 16 16 0 523 USA Houston, TX As the successor to ISS, serving six segments: national asttonauts, private astronauts, researchers, manufacturers, exploration companies, advertisers
51 Bigelow Aerospace/BSO 4 Earth Orbit Owner/Operator - 6 0 330 USA Las Vegas, NV Achieving economic breakthroughs in the costs associated with the design, development, and construction of habitable space structures
52 Orion Span 2 Earth Hardware & Service Provider - 6 0 0 USA San Mateo, CA Building and sustaining human communities in space
53 InterPlanetary Ventures 0 - Hardware & Service Provider - 0 0 0 USA San Francisco, CA Developing the inner solar system for human settlement, with infrastructure, exploration and development projects
54 Leviathan Space 0 Earth Orbit, Mars Hardware & Service Provider - 0 0 0 USA Pompano Beach, FL Developing space stations with artificial gravity that will serve as the future havens that will facilitate research, manufacturing, science, trade and tourism in deep space
55 Our Space 0 - Owner/Operator - 0 0 0 USA Firestone, CO Dramatically increasing the number of in-space destinations
43 Boeing 9 Moon Hardware & Service Provider Public 0 0 0 USA St. Louis, MO Operator of the ISS and supporting the development of deep space habitats as part of NASA's NextSTEP program
44 Thales Alenia Space 9 Earth Orbit Hardware & Service Provider Joint Venture 0 0 460 France Cannes Provided ESA with the Columbus, Harmony, Tranquility, Cupola, and Leonardo modules for the ISS
45 Lockheed Martin 8 Mars, Moon Hardware & Service Provider Public 0 0 0 USA Littleton, CO Supporting the development of deep space habitats as part of NASA's NextSTEP program
46 ILC Dover 7 Earth Orbit Hardware & Service Provider 125 0 0 0 USA Frederica, DE Developing and manufacturing inflatable habitats and shelters for use in space and for lunar/planetary exploration
Company SFR Destination Category Funding ($M) Occupancy Floor Area (m^2) Volume (m^3) Country HQ Location Description

SpaceFund Reality (SFR) Rating

Surface Habitats Database

(scroll up or click here to see the In-Space Habitats Database)

 Last Update: September 12, 2020

Habitats (Surface)

wdt_ID Company SFR Destination Category Funding ($M) Occupancy Floor Area (m^2) Volume (m^3) Material 1 Material 2 Country HQ Location Description
117 Albert Kahn/Yates Construction 2 Mars Designer Joint Venture 4 0 0 Concrete HDPE USA Detroit, MI Designing a 3D printed Mars habitat
118 4th Planet Logistics 1 Mars, Moon Designer - 0 0 0 - - USA Mundelein, IL Designing habitats from naturally occurring terrestrial lava tubes in order to allow humans to find homes on the Moon and Mars
119 United Space Structures 1 Moon Designer/Developer - 100 17,483 73,062 Lunar Regolith - USA - Providing subsurface habitation capabilities to enable Lunar commerce
120 ACASA 0 Moon Designer/Developer - 0 0 0 - - Portugal - Focused on using exponential technologies to build homes on the Moon
121 Exolife 0 Moon Designer/Developer - 0 0 0 - - USA - Establishing life on the Moon via a 3D printed lunar base
114 Instarz 2 Moon Designer/Developer - 8 0 1,000 - - Puerto Rico Mayaguez Creating Remnant, a self-sustaining habitat for the lunar surface
115 Kepler Shipyards 2 Moon Developer - 0 0 0 - - USA Austin, TX Developing the Mk 1 Outpost for the OpenLuna Foundation
102 AI SpaceFactory 5 Mars, Moon Designer/Developer - 4 100 430 Martian Polymer Basalt Fiber USA New York, NY Multi-planetary architecture and technology firm pioneering autonomous and sustainable construction with a first-principles design vision
103 SpaceX 5 Mars Designer/Developer 3570 0 0 0 - - USA Hawthorne, CA Using Starship to establish a Mars base, then build a thriving city and eventually a self-sustaining civilization on Mars
104 Bigelow Aerospace 3 Moon Designer/Developer - 6 0 330 - - USA Las Vegas, NV Developing "First Base", a habitat for the lunar surface
Company SFR Destination Category Funding ($M) Occupancy Floor Area (m^2) Volume (m^3) Material 1 Material 2 Country HQ Location Description

SpaceFund Sectors of Interest

SpaceFund is interested in a number of sectors of the space economy, specifically Transportation, Communication, Human Factors, Supplies, and Energy. In the coming months we will post SFR ratings for companies from all of these sectors, providing a robust overview of the state of frontier-enabling companies across the industry. Please check back frequently to view new sub-sector databases, and sign up to receive our emails to be notified of each new release.

Click on the black buttons below to view the available SFR databases.

SpaceFund is a new type of venture capital firm, providing near-term liquidity through security tokens and informed investing in a diversified portfolio of space companies.

Join Our Community

Subscribe for the Best Research and Insights 

Success! NewSpace Insights Incoming.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This